Context matters: The importance of university and family for young nascent entrepreneurs

  • Linda F. Edelman Management Department, Bentley University, USA
  • Tatiana Manolova Management Department, Bentley University, USA
  • Galina V. Shirokova Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Department of Management, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Tatyana V. Tsukanova Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University, Russia

Аннотация

Nascent entrepreneurs are those individuals who engage in start-up activities as part of the process of starting a new venture. In many cases, these activities lead to successful founding, but in some situations, the entrepreneur’s initial ideas go unrealized because the new venture cannot mobilize the necessary resources needed to create a fledging firm. In this paper, we look at the impact of the family and university social context on young student nascent entrepreneurs. Our findings based on Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey (GUESSS) wave in 2011 suggest that both family and university have a significant impact on the entrepreneurs’ progress through the venturing process. However, when we take a finergrained look, we find surprising gender differences. Although female entrepreneurs rely on strong family ties for support, they are better than men at utilizing their weaker university connections to make progress through the venture creation process. This suggests that for women, all types of social support are important in their venture creation processes.

Ключевые слова:

nascent women entrepreneurs, start-up activities, social context, university support, family support, Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey (GUESSS)

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Литература


REFERENCES IN LATIN ALPHABET

Al-Dajani H., Marlow S. 2010. Impact of women’s home-based enterprise on family dynamics: Evidence from Jordan. International Small Business Journal 28 (5): 470–486.

Aldrich H. E. 1989. Networking among women entrepreneurs. In: O. Hagen, C. Rivchum, D. Sexton (eds). Women Owned Businesses; 103–132. Praeger: N.Y.

Aldrich H. E., Cliff J. E. 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (5): 573–596.

Aldrich H. E., Elam A. B., Reese P. R. 1997. Strong ties, weak ties, and strangers: Do women business owners differ from men in their use of networking to obtain assistance? In: S. Birley, I. MacMillan (eds). Entrepreneurship in a Global Context; 1–25. Routledge: London.

Aldrich H. E., Sakano T. 1995. Unbroken ties: How the personal networks of Japanese business owners compare to those in other nations. In: M. Fruin (ed.). Networks and Markets. Oxford University Press: N.Y.

Aldrich H. E., Reese P. R., Dubini P. 1989. Women on the verge of a breakthrough: Networking among entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 1 (4): 339–356.

Aldrich H. E., Zimmer C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: D. L. Sexton, R. W. Smilor (eds). The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship; 3–23. Ballinger: Cambridge, MA.

Alsos G. A., Carter S., Ljunggren E. 2014. Kinship and business: How entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 26 (1–2): 97–122.

Anderson A. R., Drakopoulou Dodd S., Jack S. L. 2012. Entrepreneurship as connecting: Some implications for theorising and practice. Management Decision 50 (5): 958–971.

Autio E., Keeley R. H., Klofsten M., Parker G.C., Hay M. 2001. Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2 (2): 145–160.

Bergmann H., Hundt C., Sternberg R. 2016. What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics 47 (1): 53–76.

Bernard J. 1981. The Female World. The Free Press/MacMillan Publishing Company: N.Y.

Blank S. 2013. Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review 91 (5): 63–72.

Bogatyreva K., Edelman L., Manolova T., Osiyevskyy O., Shirokova G. 2019. When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of national culture. Journal of Business Research 96: 309–321.

Brass D. J. 1985. Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal 28 (2): 327–343.

Brush C. G. 1992. Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 16 (4): 5–31.

Brush C. G., Manolova T. S., Edelman L. F. 2008. Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing 23 (5): 547–566.

Burt R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

Burt R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 349–399.

Carey T. A., Flanagan D. J., Palmer T. B. 2010. An examination of university student entrepreneurial intentions by type of venture. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 15 (4): 503–517.

Carter N. M., Brush C. G. 2004. Gender. In: W. B. Gartner (ed.). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics; 12–25. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Carter N., Brush C., Greene P., Gatewood E., Hart M. 2003. Women entrepreneurs who break through to equity financing: The influence of human, social and financial capital. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 5 (1): 1–28.

Carter N. M., Gartner W. B., Reynolds P. 1996. Exploring start-up sequences. Journal of Business Venturing 11 (3): 151–166.

Carter N. M., Gartner W. B., Shaver K. G. 2004. Career reasons. In: W. B. Gartner, K. G. Shaver, N. M. Carter, P. D. Reynolds (eds). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation; 142–152. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Cochran S.L. 2019. What's gender got to do with it? The experiences of U.S. women entrepreneurship students. Journal of Small Business Management 57 (S1): 111–129.

Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.

Coleman J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.

Cromie S., Birley S. 1990. Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing 7 (3): 237–251.

Dana L.-P., Gurau C., Light I., Muhammad N. 2020. Family, community, and ethnic capital as entrepreneurial resources: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Small Business Management. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12507

Davidsson P. 2006. Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship 2 (1): 1–76.

Davidsson P., Honig B. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (3): 301–331.

Delmar F., Davidsson P. 2000. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 12 (1): 1–23.

DiMaggio P., Louch H. 1998. Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks? American Sociological Review 63 (5): 619–637.

Eagly A. H., Wood W., Diekman A. B. 2000. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In: T. Eckes, H. M. Trautner (eds). The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender; 123–174. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.

Edelman L. F., Manolova T. S., Shirokova G., Tsukanova T. 2016. The impact of family support on young entrepreneurs’ start-up activities. Journal of Business Venturing 31 (4): 428–448.

Gartner W. B., Carter N. M., Reynolds P. 2004. Business start-up activities. In: W. B. Gartner, K. G. Shaver, N. M. Carter, P. D. Reynolds (eds). The Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Organization Creation; 285–299. Sage Series: Newbury Park, CA.

Gilligan C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press: Boston.

Gouldner A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25 (2): 161–178.

Granovetter M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.

Granovetter M. S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.

Greve A., Salaff J. W. 2003. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (1): 1–22.

Haines V. A., Hurlbert J. S. 1992. Network range and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33 (3): 254–266.

Hair J. F., Tatham R. L., Anderson R. E. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hampton A., Cooper S., Mcgowan P. 2009. Female entrepreneurial networks and networking activity in technology-based ventures: An exploratory study. International Small Business Journal 27 (2): 193–214.

Hebert R. H., Link A. N. 1989. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 1: 39–49.

Hite J. M., Hesterly W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3): 275–286.

Ibarra H. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 18 (1): 56–87.

Kanter R. M. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.

Katz J., Williams M. P. 1997. Gender, self-employment and weak-tie networking through formal organizations. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 9 (3): 183–198.

Karra N., Tracey P., Phillips N. 2006. Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (6): 861–877.

Kolvereid L. 1996. Organizational employment versus self-employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20 (3): 23–31.

Krueger N. F., Reilly M. D., Carsrud A. L. 2000. Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5–6): 411–432.

Laspita S., Breugst N., Heblich S., Patzelt H. 2012. Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing 27 (4): 414–435.

Laukkanen M. 2000. Exploring alternative approaches in high-level entrepreneurship education: Creating micro-mechanisms for endogenous regional growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12 (1): 25–47.

Lichtenstein B. B., Carter N. M., Dooley K. J., Gartner W. B. 2007. Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 22 (2): 236–261.

Lincoln J. R., Miller J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (2): 181–199.

Lyons E., Zhang L. 2018.Who does (not) benefit from entrepreneurship programs? Strategic Management Journal 39 (1): 85–112.

Marsden P. V. 1988. Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks 10 (1): 57–76.

McGowan P., Cooper S., Durkin M., O’Kane C. 2015. The influence of social and human capital in developing young women as entrepreneurial business leaders. Journal of Small Business Management 53 (3): 645–661.

McIntosh J. C., Islam S. 2010. Beyond the veil: The influence of Islam on female entrepreneurship in a conservative Muslim context. International Management Review 6 (1): 102–111.

McKeever E., Jack S., Anderson A. 2015. Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing 30 (1): 50–65.

McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

Meoli A., Fini R., Sobrero M., Wiklund J. 2020. How entrepreneurial intentions influence entrepreneurial career choices: The moderating influence of social context. Journal of Business Venturing 35 (3). In-press: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105982

Morris M., Shirokova G., Tsukanova T. 2017. Student entrepreneurship and the university ecosystem: A multi-country empirical exploration. European Journal of International Management 11 (1): 65–85.

Nielsen S. L., Lassen A. H. 2012. Identity in entrepreneurship effectuation theory: A supplementary framework. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 8 (3): 373–389.

Peterman N. E., Kennedy J. 2003. Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (2): 129–144.

Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. 2003. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.

Rasmussen E. A., Mosey S., Wright M. 2015. The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university sin-offs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 27 (7-8): 430–457.

Renzulli L.A., Aldrich H., Moody J. 2000. Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces 79 (2): 523–546.

Reynolds P. D., Miller B. 1992. New firm gestation: Conception, birth and implications for research. Journal of Business Venturing 7 (5): 405–417.

Reynolds P. D., Storey J., Westhead P. 1994. Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies 28 (4): 443–456.

Reynolds P.D. 2010. New firm creation in the United States: A PSED I overview. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 3 (1): 1–150.

Ruef M., Aldrich H. E., Carter N. M. 2003. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review 68 (2): 195–222.

Samuelsson M., Davidsson P. 2009. Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics 33 (2): 229–255.

Shagalkina M., Latukha M., Mitskevich E., Strogetskaya E. 2019. Factors of migration intentions of talented graduates from leading Russian universities. Russian Management Journal 17 (4): 445–466.

Shepherd D. 2015. Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing 30 (4): 489–507.

Shepherd D., Wennberg K., Suddaby R., Wicklund J. 2019. What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 45 (1): 159–196.

Schøtt T., Kew P., Cheraghi M. 2015. Future Potential: A GEM Perspective on Youth Entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. [Electronic resource]. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49200 (accessed: 26.04.2020).

Shirokova G., Bogatyreva K., Galkina T. 2014. Effectuation and causation: Relationship between university infrastructure and behavioral choice in new venture creation by student-entrepreneurs. Russian Management Journal 12 (3): 59–86. (In Russian)

Sieger P., Fueglistaller U., Zellweger T. 2011. Entrepreneurial Intentions and Activities of Students Across the World. International Report on the GUESSS Project 2011. Swiss Research institute of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. University of St. Gallen (KMU_HSG).

Siemsen E., Roth A., Oliveira P. 2010. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods 13 (3): 456–476.

Sørensen J. B. 2007. Closure and exposure: Mechanisms in the intergenerational transmission of self-employment. In: M. Ruef, M. Lounsbury (eds). Research in the Sociology of Organizations; 83–124. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bradford.

Souitaris V., Zerbinati S., Al-Laham A. 2007. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing 22 (4): 566–591.

Steier L. 2007. New venture creation and organization: A familial sub-narrative. Journal of Business Research 60 (10): 1099–1107.

Watson J. 2011. Networking: Gender differences and the association with firm performance. International Small Business Journal 30 (5): 536–558.

Weiler S., Bernasek A. 2001. Dodging the glass ceiling? Networks and the new wave of women entrepreneurs. The Social Science Journal 38 (1): 85–103.

Weiss J., Anisimova T., Shirokova G. 2019. The transition of entrepreneurial intention into start-up behavior: The moderating role of regional social capital. International Small Business Journal 37 (5): 473–501.

Wegner D., Thomas E., Teixeira E. K., Maehler A. E. 2020. University entrepreneurial push strategy and students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behavior & Research 26 (2): 307–325.

Wellman B., Wortley S. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 96 (3): 558–588.

Welter F. 2011. Contextualizing entrepreneurship — conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (1): 165–184.

Zazdravnykh E. 2019. The historical effects of the regional entrepreneurial activity. Russian Management Journal 17 (1): 97–120. (In Russian)

Zellweger T., Sieger P., Halter F. 2011. Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing 26 (5): 521–536.

Опубликован
2020-07-21
Как цитировать
Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T., Shirokova, G. V., & Tsukanova, T. V. (2020). Context matters: The importance of university and family for young nascent entrepreneurs. Российский журнал менеджмента, 18(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.201
Раздел
Теоретические и эмпирические исследования