Intra-fi rm Orientations and Their Infl uence on Firm Growth: The Case of Russian SMEs

Authors

  • Alexander V. Kulikov Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
  • Galina V. Shirokova Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-1752

Abstract

The results of survey of specific sets of deliberate intra-firm activities called intra-firm orientations are discussed. The authors distinguish between entrepreneurial orientation, change orientation and knowledge orientation. Factor analysis and structure equation modelling methods are used to test the hypotheses of the very existence of intra-firm orientations, their positive influence on firm growth. Also the orientations that dominate in different industries (Retail/Wholesale, HoReCa, IT) are analyzed. The results of the empirical research of 500 Russian SMEs show that at least three orientations exist in each firm. Knowledge orientation and change orientation have positive effect on fi rm growth. In addition, different orientations are manifested in firms belonging to different industries.

Keywords:

intra-firm orientations, firm growth, entrepreneurship, organizational changes, knowledge management, factor analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА НА РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ

Андреева Т. Е., Чайка В. А. 2006. К дискуссии о сущности динамических способностей. Вестник С.-Петербургского ун-та. Сер. Менеджмент (4): 163–174.

Гусев А., Измайлов Ч., Михайлевская М. 1987. Измерение в психологии: Общий психологический практикум. М.: Смысл.

Дрейпер Н., Смит Г. 2007. Прикладной регрессионный анализ. 3-е изд. М.: Изд. дом «Вильямс».

Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. 2000. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. М.: Финстатинформ.

Сайдуллаев Ф., Шестоперов А. 2009. Оценка уровня развития малого предпринимательства в регионах России в 2008 г. Отчет национального института системных исследований проблем предпринимательства. Москва.

Шемракова В. Н. Катькало В. С. 2004. Международные гостиничные сети: специфика организации и типология стратегий развития. Вестник С.-Петербургского ун-та. Сер. Менеджмент (4): 3–30.

Широкова Г. В., Сарычева В. А., Благов Е. Ю., Куликов А. В. 2009. Внутрифирменное предпринимательство: подходы к исследованию феномена. Вестник С.-Пе тербургского ун-та. Сер. Менеджмент (1): 3–35.


REFERENCES IN LATIN ALPHABET

Adizes I. 1988. Corporate Lifecycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do about It. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Aldrich H. E., Auster E. R. 1986. Even dwarfs started small. In: Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. (eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8. JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 165–198.

Barney J. B. 2002. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Bentler P. M. 1992. On the fi t of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin 112 (3): 400–404.

Bernhardt K., Donthu N., Kennet P. 2000. A longitudinal analysis of satisfaction and profitability. Journal of Business Research 47 (2): 161–171.

Bollen K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley: N. Y.

Brown T. A. 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford: N. Y.

Browne M. W., Cudeck R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K. A., Long J. S. (eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage: Newbury Park, CA; 136–162.

Buhalis D. 1998. Strategic use of information technologies in tourism industry. Tourism management 19 (5): 409–421.

Byrne B. 2009. Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: N. Y.

Chesbrough H. 2003. The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review 45 (3): 3–58.

Christensen C. M., Overdorf M. 2000. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harward Business Review 78 (2): 66–75.

Clercq D., Sapienza H., Crijns H. 2005. The internationalization of small and mediumsized firms. Small Business Economics 24 (4): 409–419.

Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 5 (3): 128–152.

Covin J., Slevin D. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16 (1): 7–25.

Cyert R. M., March J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Davidsson P., Delmar F., Wiklund J. 2002. Entrepreneurship as growth; Growth as entrepreneurship. In: Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Camp S. M., Sexton D. L. (eds.). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a Newmindset. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford; 328–342.

Davidsson P., Steffens P., Fitzsimmons J. 2009. Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing 24 (4): 388–406.

Delmar F., Davidsson P., Gartner W. B. 2003. Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2):189–216.

Dimitratos P., Lioukas S., Carter S. 2004. The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of the domestic environment. International Business Review 13 (1): 19–41.

Drucker P. 1998. From capitalism to knowledge society. In: Neef D. (ed.). The Knowledge Economy. Butterworth-Heinemann: Woburn, MA; 15–34.

Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.

Evans D. 1987. Test of alternative theories of firm growth. Journal of Political Economy 95 (4): 657–674.

Fabrigar L. R., Wegener D. T., MacCallum R. C., Strahan E. J. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 4 (3): 272–299.

Fisher K., Fisher M. D. 1998. The Distributed Mind: Achieving High Performance Through the Collective Intelligence of Know ledge Work Teams. AMACOM: N. Y.

Garnsey E., Stam E., Hefferman P. 2006. New firm growth: Exploring processes and paths. Industry and Innovation 13 (1): 1–24.

Grant R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for the strategy formulation. California Management Review 33 (3): 114–135.

Hakonsson D. D. 2006. How misfits between managerial cognitive orientations and situational uncertainty affect organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 58 (1): 89–94.

Helfat C., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell: Oxford, UK.

Hendriks P. 1999. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management 6 (2): 91–100.

Hult G. T. M., Ketchen D. J., Slater S. F. 2005. Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12): 1173–1181.

Jantunen A., Puumalainen K., Saarenketo S., Kylaheiko K. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 3 (3): 223–243.

Jantunen A. 2005b. Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management 8 (3): 336–349.

Jones E., Busch P., Dacin P. 2003. Firm market orientation and salesperson customer orientation: Interpersonal and intra-personal influences on customer service and retention in business-to-business buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Business Research 56 (4): 323–340.

Kogut, B., Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3): 383–397.

Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing 54 (2): 1–18.

Lazonick W. 2002. The US corporate enterprise and the theory of growth of the firm. In: Pitelis C. (ed.). Theory of the Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Lieberman M. 1987. The learning curve, diffusion and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal 8 (5): 441–452.

Lumpkin G., Dess G. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 429–451.

Lumpkin G., Dess G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 135–172.

Lytle R., Hom P., Mokwa M. 1998. SERV*OR: A managerial measure of organizational service-orientation. Journal of Retailing 74 (4): 455–489.

Machand D., Kettinger W., Rollins J. 2000. Information orientation: People, technology and the bottom line. Sloan Management Review Summer 41 (4): 69–74.

McKelvie A, Wiklund J., Davidsson P. 2006. А resource-based view on organic and acquired growth. Wiklund J. et al. (eds.). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Form Emergence and Growth, Vol. 9. JAI Press: Amsterdam; 175–194.

McGuinness T., Morgan R. E. 2003. Organizational change capability: The theoretical construct and its operational measurement. In: Developments in Marketing Science, Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science Conference. Washington, DC.

Miller D., Friesen P. H. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science 24 (9): 921–933.

Miles M., Arnold D. 1991. The relationship between marketing orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 15 (4): 49–65.

Morris M., Paul G. 1987. The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing 2 (3): 247–259.

Narver J. C., Slater S. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 20–35.

Penrose E. 1959. The Theory of Growth of the Firm. John Wiley: N. Y.

Pitelis C. 2002. A theory [growth of the] transnational firm: A Penrosean perspective. In: Pitelis C. (ed.). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm: the Legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Pisano G. 1994. Knowledge, integration and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal 15 (1): 85–100.

Saarenketo S., Puumalainen K., Kuivalainen O., Kylaheinko K. 2004. Dynamic knowledge related learning process in internationalization high-tech SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics 89 (3): 363–378.

Sakakibara M. 1997. Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal 18 (Supplement 1): 134–164.

Salvato C., Lassini U., Wiklund J. 2006. Dynamics of external growth in SMEs: A process model of acquisitions capabilities emergence. In: Wiklund J. et al. (eds.). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Form Emergence and Growth. Vol. 9. JAI Press: Amsterdam; 229–266.

Shepherd D. A., DeTienne D. R. 2001. Discovery of opportunities: Anomalities, accumulation and alertness. In: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College: Wellesley, MA; 138–148.

Smart D. T., Conant J. S. 1994. Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research 10 (3): 28–38.

Van der Stede W. A. 2000. The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (6): 609–622.

Teece D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature of the microfoundations of enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.

Teece D. J. 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 40 (3): 55–79.

Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–534.

Velicer W. F., Jackson D. N. 1990. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25 (1): 1–28.

Weick K., Quinn R. 1999. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 361–386.

Wiklund J. 1999. The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 24 (1): 37–48.

Wiklund J., Shepherd D. 2005. Aspiring for and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies 40 (5): 1919–1941.

Wolff J. A., Pett T. L. 2007. Learning and small firm growth: The role of entrepreneurial orientation. Academy of Management Proceedings: 1–6.

Zahra S. A., Gravis D. M. 2000. Entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5/6): 469–492.

Zollo M., Winter S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13 (3): 339–351.

Published

2010-09-06

How to Cite

Kulikov, A. V., & Shirokova, G. V. (2010). Intra-fi rm Orientations and Their Infl uence on Firm Growth: The Case of Russian SMEs. Russian Management Journal, 8(3), 3–34. Retrieved from https://rjm.spbu.ru/article/view/367

Issue

Section

New Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>