Disclosure and corporate governance: Evidence from Russian companies

Authors

  • Irina V. Berezinets Graduate School of Business, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-0283
  • Alexander A. Muravyev School of Economics and Management, Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia; Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-2582

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2024.203

Abstract

Purpose: this article aims to provide new evidence on the role of several potential drivers of corporate disclosure that have been insufficiently studied or remain controversial in the literature on accounting and corporate governance such as one-tier vs. two-tier corporate boards, having grey directors on the board, direct vs. indirect government ownership and the ownership stake of second-largest shareholders.

Methodology: the study uses rich and unique data on transparency and disclosure by Russian firms collected by the S&P agency from 2002 till 2010 and obtained by the authors under a confidentiality agreement. The analysis is based on conventional techniques of regression analysis for panel data.

Findings: there is strong evidence of complementarity between corporate governance and disclosure. In particular, disclosure is enhanced by boards with a higher proportion of truly independent directors (compared to grey directors, whose role is less clear-cut), is higher in companies with a two-tier board and those with a greater stake of the second largest shareholder. It is also found that direct government ownership is associated with reduced disclosure. In contrast, no such effect is observed for indirect ownership by the state.

Originality and contribution: the analysis uses detailed data from a country with a relatively poor corporate governance environment in general and low standards of mandatory disclosure, which helps observe relationships that would be hard to detect in better institutional settings. It is also one of the first studies that scrutinizes disclosure practices of publicly traded companies in Russia. The obtained findings emphasize the risks of reduced mandatory disclosure requirements, which Russian government allowed in response to the Western sanctions, on the background of a significant exodus of qualified independent/foreign directors from the corporate boards. Given the complementarity between disclosure and corporate governance, this may amplify the risks of poor corporate governance and performance of Russian firms.

Keywords:

disclosure, board of directors, ownership structure, corporate governance, Russia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Abdelsalam O. H., Street D. L. 2007. Corporate governance and the timeliness of corporate internet reporting by UK listed companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 16 (2): 111–130.

Abramov A., Radygin A., Entov R., Chernova M. 2017. State ownership and efficiency characteristics. Russian Journal of Economics 3 (2): 129–157.

Adams R. B., Ferreira D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94 (2): 291–309.

Aggarwal R., Erel I., Ferreira M., Matos P. 2011. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (1): 154–181.

Ali A., Chen T. Y., Radhakrishnan S. 2007. Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1–2): 238–286.

Ali W., Frynas J. G., Mahmood Z. 2017. Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24 (4): 273–294.

Allegrini M., Greco G. 2013. Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance 17 (1): 187–216.

Alotaibi K. O., Hussainey K. 2016. Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13 (4): 364–393.

Amran A., Devi S. S. 2008. The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal 23 (4): 386–404.

Ariffin M. S. M., Wan-Hussin W. N., Malak S. S. D. A. 2020. Disclosure of AGM minutes on corporate website: An assessment of Malaysian listed companies. International Journal of Banking and Finance 15 (2): 1–23.

Attig N., Guedhami O., Mishra D. 2009. Multiple large shareholders, control contests, and implied cost of equity. Journal of Corporate Finance 14 (5): 721–737.

Banerjee S., Estrin S., Pal S. 2022. Corporate disclosure, compliance and consequences: Evidence from Russia. European Journal of Finance 28 (17): 1770–1802.

Beekes W., Brown P., Zhan W., Zhang Q. 2016. Corporate governance, companies’ disclosure practices and market transparency: A cross country study. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 43 (3–4): 263–297.

Black B. S., Love I., Rachinsky A. 2006. Corporate governance indices and firms' market values: Time series evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review 7 (4): 361–379.

Borokhovich K. A., Boulton T. J., Brunarski K. R., Harman Y. S. 2014. The incentives of grey directors: Evidence from unexpected executive and board chair turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance 28: 102–115.

Botosan C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review 72 (3): 323–349.

Bueno G., Marcon R., Pruner-da-Silva A. L., Ribeirete F. 2018. The role of the board in voluntary disclosure. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 18 (5): 886–910.

Cabeza-Garcia L., Sacristán-Navarro M., Gómez-Ansón S. 2017. Family involvement and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Family Business Strategy 8 (2): 109–122.

Central Bank of Russia. 2014. Corporate governance code. Official Journal of the CBR 40 (1518). (In Russian)

Chen K. C., Wei K. C., Chen Z. 2003. Disclosure, Corporate Governance, and the Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from Asia's Emerging Markets. Working Paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology: Hong Kong.

Chernykh L. 2008. Ultimate ownership and control in Russia. Journal of Financial Economics 88 (1): 169–192.

Cheung Y. L., Rau P. R., Stouraitis A. 2010. Helping hand or grabbing hand? Central vs. local government shareholders in Chinese listed firms. Review of Finance 14 (4): 669–694.

Coles J. L., Daniel N. D., Naveen L. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329–356.

Cotter J., Lokman N., Najah M. M. 2011. Voluntary disclosure research: Which theory is relevant? Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research 6 (2): 77–95.

Cucari N., Esposito de Falco S., Orlando B. 2018. Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25 (3): 250–266.

Cuervo-Cazurra A., Li C. 2021. State ownership and internationalization: The advantage and disadvantage of stateness. Journal of World Business 56 (1): 101112.

Cuervo-Cazurra A., Inkpen A., Musacchio A., Ramaswamy K. 2014. Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies 45 (8): 919–942.

Dolgopyatova T., Iwasaki I., Yakovlev A. A. (eds). 2009. Organization and Development of Russian Business: A Firm-level Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Dolgopyatova T., Libman A., Yakovlev A. A. 2018. Unintended benefits of empowering boards in conglomerates: A case study of AFK Sistema. Journal of East European Management Studies 23 (2): 177–202.

Dyck A., Volchkova N., Zingales L. 2008. The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Finance 63 (3): 1093–1135.

Enache L., Hussainey K. 2020. The substitutive relation between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in their effects on firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 54 (2): 413–445.

Eng L. L., Mak Y. T. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (4): 325–345.

Enikolopov R., Petrova M., Stepanov S. 2014. Firm value in crisis: Effects of firm-level transparency and country-level institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance 46: 72–84.

Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2): 301–325.

FCSM. 2002. Code of Corporate Conduct. Federal Commission on the Securities Market. Moscow. (In Russian)

Forker J. J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research 22 (86): 111–124.

Fox M. B. 2014. Ongoing issues in Russian corporate governance. Colum. J. Transnat'l 52: 435–569.

Gad J. 2020. Voluntary disclosures on control system over financial reporting and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from Poland. Journal of East European Management Studies 25 (4): 698–729.

Gao L., Kling G. 2012. The impact of corporate governance and external audit on compliance to mandatory disclosure requirements in China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 21 (1): 17–31.

Garanina T., Aray Y. 2021. Enhancing CSR disclosure through foreign ownership, foreign board members, and cross-listing: Does it work in Russian context? Emerging Markets Review 46: 100754.

Garanina T., Muravyev A. 2021. The gender composition of corporate boards and firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review 48: 100772.

Garcia-Meca E., Sanchez-Ballesta J. P. 2010. The association of board independence and ownership concentration with voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review 19 (3): 603–627.

Gillette A. B., Noe T. H., Rebello M. J. 2009. Board structures around the world: An experimental investigation. Review of Finance 12 (1): 93–140.

Gisbert A., Navallas B. 2013. The association between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in the presence of severe agency conflicts. Advances in Accounting 29 (2): 286–298.

Glaum M., Schmidt P., Street D. L., Vogel S. 2013. Compliance with IFRS 3-and IAS 36-required disclosures across 17 European countries: Company-and country-level determinants. Accounting and Business Research 43 (3): 163–204.

Grosman A. 2022. Mitigating financing constraints on investment: Ownership and transparency in Russia. Journal of East European Management Studies 27 (3): 434–461.

Grosman A., Aguilera R. V., Wright M. 2019. Lost in translation? Corporate governance, independent boards and blockholder appropriation. Journal of World Business 54 (4): 258–272.

Gul F. A., Srinidhi B., Ng A. C. 2011. Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics 51 (3): 314–338.

Hare P., Muravyev A. 2003. Privatization in Russia. In: D. Parker D. Saal (Eds.). 2003. International Handbook on Privatization. Edward Elgar Publishing; 347–374.

Hassan O. A., Romilly P., Giorgioni G., Power D. 2009. The value relevance of disclosure: Evidence from the emerging capital market of Egypt. International Journal of Accounting 44 (1): 79–102.

Hodgdon C., Hughes S. B. 2016. The effect of corporate governance, auditor choice and global activities on EU company disclosures of estimates and judgments. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 26: 28–46.

Hope O. K. 2013. Large shareholders and accounting research. China Journal of Accounting Research 6 (1): 3–20.

Hope O. K., Kang T., Kim J. W. 2013. Voluntary disclosure practices by foreign firms cross-listed in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 9 (1): 50–66.

Hsu H. H., Wu C. Y. H. 2014. Board composition, grey directors and corporate failure in the UK. The British Accounting Review 46 (3): 215–227.

Hu Y. Y., Zhu Y., Tucker J., Hu Y. 2018. Ownership influence and CSR disclosure in China. Accounting Research Journal 31 (1): 8–21.

Iwasaki I. 2008. The determinants of board composition in a transforming economy: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance 14 (5): 532–549.

Iwasaki I. 2013. Firm-level determinants of board system choice: Evidence from Russia. Comparative Economic Studies 55 (4): 636–671.

Iwasaki I., Mizobata S., Muravyev A. 2018. Ownership dynamics and firm performance in an emerging economy: A meta-analysis of the Russian literature. Post-Communist Economies 30 (3): 290–333.

Jiang F., Cai W., Wang X., Zhu B. 2018. Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance 50: 66–83.

Kaiser B. 2014. RHAUSMAN: Stata Module to Perform Robust Hausman Specification Test. Statistical Software Components S457909, Boston College Department of Economics.

Khan T. M., Nosheen S., ul Haq N. 2020. Corporate governance mechanism and comparative analysis of one-tier and two-tier board structures: Evidence from ASEAN countries. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17 (2): 61–72.

Khemakhem H., Arroyo P., Montecinos J. 2022. Gender diversity on board committees and ESG disclosure: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Management and Governance 27 (3): 1–26.

Kobbi-Fakhfakh S., Shabou R. M., Pigé B. 2020. Intensive board monitoring, investor protection and segment disclosure quality: Evidence from EU. Accounting in Europe 17 (1): 52–77.

Lakhal F. 2005. Voluntary earnings disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting and Finance 4 (3): 64–85.

Lambert R., Leuz C., Verrecchia R. E. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (2): 385–420.

Lan Y., Wang L., Zhang X. 2013. Determinants and features of voluntary disclosure in the Chinese stock market. China Journal of Accounting Research 6 (4): 265–285.

Lara J. M. G., Osma B. G., Mora A., Scapin M. 2017. The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance 45: 651–668.

Lepore L., Pisano S., Di Vaio A., Alvino F. 2018. The myth of the ‘good governance code’: An analysis of the relationship between ownership structure and the comply-or-explain disclosure. Corporate Governance 18 (5): 809–838.

Li T., Zaiats N. 2017. Information environment and earnings management of dual class firms around the world. Journal of Banking & Finance 74: 1–23.

Liang J. W., Lin M. F., Chin C. L. 2012. Does foreign institutional ownership motivate firms in an emerging market to increase voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 39 (1): 55–76.

Lim S., Matolcsy Z., Chow D. 2007. The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review 16 (3): 555–583.

Liu S. 2015. Corporate governance and forward-looking disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 25: 16–30.

Liu Y., Valenti A., Chen Y. J. 2016. Corporate governance and information transparency in Taiwan’s public firms: The moderating effect of family ownership. Journal of Management & Organization 22 (5): 662–679.

Maury B., Pajuste A. 2005. Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 29 (7): 1813–1834.

Michelon G., Bozzolan S., Beretta S. 2015. Board monitoring and internal control system disclosure in different regulatory environments. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 16 (1): 138–164.

Mnif Y., Borgi H. 2020. The association between corporate governance mechanisms and compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements: Evidence from 12 African countries. Corporate Governance 20 (7): 1371–1392.

Muravyev A. 2017. Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects. Economic Systems 41 (1): 5–25.

Muravyev A., Berezinets I., Ilina Y. 2014. The structure of corporate boards and private benefits of control: Evidence from the Russian stock exchange. International Review of Financial Analysis 34: 247–261.

National council on corporate governance. 2011. National report on corporate governance, Issue IV. Moscow. (In Russian)

Nikitina N. A. 2014. New requirements for information disclosure by issuers on the securities market. Economic and Legal Issues 1: 36–41. (In Russian)

OECD. 2002. The White Paper on Corporate Governance in Russia. OECD: Paris.

O’Sullivan M., Percy M., Stewart J. 2008. Australian evidence on corporate governance attributes and their association with forward-looking information in the annual report. Journal of Management & Governance 12: 5–35.

Pagano M., Röell A. 1998. The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1): 187–225.

Patel S. A., Balic A., Bwakira L. 2002. Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm-level in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review 3 (4): 325–337.

Patel S. A., Dallas G. S. 2002. Transparency and disclosure: Overview of methodology and study results – United States. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.422800

Pellegrini C. B., Sironi E. 2017. Does a one-tier board affect firms' performances? Evidences from Italian unlisted enterprises. Small Business Economics 48 (1): 213–224.

Pham H. T. S., Tran H. T. 2019. Board and corporate social responsibility disclosure of multinational corporations. Multinational Business Review 27 (1): 77–98.

Qu W., Leung P., Cooper B. 2013. A study of voluntary disclosure of listed Chinese firms — A stakeholder perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal 28 (3): 261–294.

Saha R., Kabra K. C. 2020. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies. Business Perspectives and Research 8 (2): 117–138.

Saha R., Kabra K. C. 2022. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from India. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 20 (1): 127–160.

Samaha K., Khlif H., Hussainey K. 2015. The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 24: 13–28.

Shleifer A. 1998. State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 133–150.

Solomon D., Palas R., Baranes A. 2020. The quality of information provided by dual‐class firms. American Business Law Journal 57 (3): 443–486.

Standard & Poor’s. 2006. Transparency and Disclosure by Russian Companies 2006: Modest Progress Amid the IPO Deal. Standard & Poor’s Governance Services.

Van der Schee P. A. 2011. Regulation of issuers and investor protection in the US and EU. Doctoral Thesis, Tilburg University.

Vavulin D. A. 2012. Information Disclosure by Joint-stock Companies. Justicinform Publ: Moscow. (In Russian)

Vickers J., Yarrow G. 1991. Economic perspectives on privatization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2): 111–132.

Vural D. 2018. Disclosure practices by family firms: Evidence from Swedish publicly listed firms. Accounting in Europe 15 (3): 347–373.

Yermack D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185–211.

Zaini S. M., Samkin G., Sharma U., Davey H. 2018. Voluntary disclosure in emerging countries: A literature review. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 8 (1): 29–65.

Zamil I. A., Ramakrishnan S., Jamal N. M., Hatif M. A., Khatib S. F. 2023. Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 21 (2): 232–267.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-09-10

How to Cite

Berezinets, I. V., & Muravyev, A. A. (2024). Disclosure and corporate governance: Evidence from Russian companies. Russian Management Journal, 22(2), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2024.203

Issue

Section

Theoretical and Empirical Studies