Top Management Turnover in Russian Industrial Companies: The Evidence from The Russian Economic Barometer

Authors

  • Rostislav I. Kapelushnikov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-2110
  • Natalia V. Demina Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The paper provides new survey evidence of effects of the firm’s performance and ownership profile on management turnover and succession patterns in Russian industrial firms. On the basis of the Russian Economic Barometer panel data authors analyze changes in average tenure of top managers in the REB respondent enterprises over 1990s, estimate probabilities of their replacement and assess shares of incumbents and nonincumbents among CEOs and Chairmen of the Board of Directors. The major econometric findings are that managers’ entrenchment is positively related to insider ownership and negatively to outsider ownership. Besides, a probability to be replaced is higher for poorly performing than for well performing top executives. As for succession patterns, «outside» appointments seem to be more likely in distressed companies and in companies dominated by outsiders while «inside» appointments seem to be more likely in well performed companies and in companies dominated by insiders. The main conclusion following from the study is that in spite of numerous builtin defects, the Russian system of corporate governance is doing what it has to do, helping to select the more competent managers and to enhance effectiveness of their work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА НА РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ

Бикбов Р. Р. 2001. Конкуренция и смена менеджеров в России. Препринт # BSP/01/046 R. М.: Российская экономическая школа. http://www.nes.ru

Капелюшников Р., Демина Н. 2005. Влияние характеристик собственности на результаты деятельности российских промышленных предприятий. Вопросы экономики (2): 53–68.

Муравьев А. А. 2003. Обновление директорского корпуса на российских приватизированных предприятиях. Российский журнал менеджмента 1 (1): 77–90.

Рачинский А. А. 2001. Смена менеджеров и эффективность компаний в России. Препринт # BSP/ 2001/044 R. М.: Российская экономическая школа. http://www.nes.ru


REFERENCES IN LATIN ALPHABET

Denis D. J., Denis D. K., Sarin A. 1997. Ownership structure and top executives turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 45 (2): 193–221.

Fishman R., Khurana R., Rhodes-Kropf M. 2005. Governance and CEO Turnover: Do Something or Do the Right Thing? http://www.ssrn.com

Volpin P. 2002. Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics 64 (1): 61–90.

Published

2005-10-03

How to Cite

Kapelushnikov, R. I., & Demina, N. V. (2005). Top Management Turnover in Russian Industrial Companies: The Evidence from The Russian Economic Barometer. Russian Management Journal, 3(3), 27–42. Retrieved from https://rjm.spbu.ru/article/view/701

Issue

Section

New Research