Транснациональная компания: трактовка с позиций ресурсной концепции

Авторы

  • Христос Н. Пителис Школа бизнеса им. Джаджа Кембриджского университета, Великобритания

Аннотация

Мы опираемся на работы Эдит Пенроуз для построения ресурсной концепции транснациональной компании (ТНК). Предполагается, что международная географическая диверсификация обусловлена эндогенными процессами роста фирмы, ее «производственными возможностями», пределами экспансии на внутреннем рынке, несостоятельностью или отсутствием рынков, ощущаемыми различными возможностями за границей и олигополистическим взаимодействием. Выбор институциональной формы (прямые инвестиции за границей, субподряд, лицензирование или экспорт) обусловлен теми же факторами, а также различными характеристиками контроля и/или трансакционных издержек, присущими разным институциональным формам.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Библиографические ссылки


REFERENCES IN LATIN ALPHABET

Alchian A., Demsetz H. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review 62 (5): 777–795. (Русск. пер.: Алчян А. А., Демсец Г. 2003. Производство, стоимость информации и экономическая организация. В кн.: Слуцкий А. Г. (ред.). Вехи экономической мысли. Теория отраслевых рынков. Т. 5. СПб.: Экономическая школа; 280–317.)

Best M. 1990. The New Competition: Institutions for Industrial Restructuring. Polity Press: Oxford. (Русск. пер.: Бест М. 2002. Новая конкуренция: Институты промышленного развития. М.: Теис.)

Bowles J. 1985. The production process in a competitive economy. American Economic Review 75 (1): 16–36.

Buckley P. 1990. Problems and developments in the core theory of international business. Journal of International Business Studies 21 (4): 657–665.

Buckley P. J., Casson M. C. 1976. The Future of Multinational Enterprise. Macmillan: London.

Buckley P. J., Casson M. C. 1998a. Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies 29 (3): 539–562.

Buckley P. J., Casson M. C. 1998b. Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 21–44.

Cantwell J. 1991. Theories of international production. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London.

Cantwell J. 2000. Theories of international production. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Cantwell J., Piscitello L. 2000. Accumulating technological competence — its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalisation. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (1): 21–51.

Caves R. E. 1982. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Caves R. E. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chandler A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Coase R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405. (Русск. пер.: Коуз Р. Г. 2001. Природа фирмы. В кн.: Гребенников В. Г. (ред.). Природа фирмы. М.: Дело; 33–52.)

Cowling K., Sugden R. 1987. Transnational Monopoly Capitalism. Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf.

Demsetz H. 1995. The Economics of the Business Firm: Seven Critical Commentaries. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Dunning J. H. 1958. American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry. Allen and Unwin: London.

Dunning J. H. 1981. International Production and Multinational Enterprise. Allen and Unwin: London.

Dunning J. H. 1982. Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: Towards a dynamic or developmental approach. In: Black J., Dunning J. H. (eds.). International Capital Movements. Macmillan: London.

Dunning J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1): 1–31.

Dunning J. H. 1989. Explaining International Production. Unwin Hyman: London.

Dunning J. H. 1991. The Eclectic paradigm in international production: A personal perspective. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London; 116–136.

Dunning J. H. 1992. The competitive advantage of countries and the activities of transnational corporations. Transnational Corporations 1 (2): 135–168.

Dunning J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 45–66.

Dunning J. H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A personal perspective. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Dunning J. H., Pitelis C. N. 2008. Stephen Hymer’s contribution to international business scholarship: An assessment and extension. Journal of International Business Studies, forthcoming.

Dunning J. H., Rugman A. 1985. The influence of Hymer’s dissertation on the theory of foreign direct investment. American Economic Review 75 (2): 228–239.

Fieldhouse D. 1986. The multinational: A critique of a concept. In: Teichova A., Levy-Leboyer M., Nussbaum H. (eds.). Multinational Enterprise in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Foss N. J. (ed). 1997. Resources, Firms and Strategies. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Gray H. P. 1985. Macroeconomic theories of foreign direct investment: An assessment. In: Rugman A. (ed.). New Theories of Multinational Enterprise. Croom Helm: London.

Grossman S., Hart O. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of lateral and vertical integration. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 691–719.

Hennart J.-F. 2000. Transaction costs theory and the multinational enterprise. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Holmström B., Roberts J. 1998. The boundaries of the firm revisited. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 73–94.

Hymer S. H. 1968. The large multinational ‘corporation’: An analysis of some motives for international integration of business. Revue Economique 6 (translated from the French by Nathalie Vacherot with an introduction by Mark Casson).

Hymer S. H. 1970. The efficiency (contradictions) of multinational corporations. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 60 (2): 441–448.

Hymer S. H. 1972. The multinational corporation and the law of uneven development. In: Bhagwati J. N. (ed.). Economics and World Order. Macmillan: London.

Hymer S. H. 1976. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Hymer S. H. 1979. The multinational corporation and the international division of labor. In: Cohen R. B. et al. (eds.). The Multinational Corporation: A Radical Approach. Papers by Stephen Herbert Hymer. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Iammarino S., Pitelis C. 2000. Foreign direct investment and ‘less favoured regions’: Greek FDI in Bulgaria and Romania. Global Business Review 1 (2): 155–170.

Jenkins R. 1987. Transnational Corporations and Uneven Development. Methuen: London.

Jensen M. C., Meckling W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 304–360. (Русск. пер.: Дженсен М. К., Меклинг У. Х. 2004. Теория фирмы: поведение менеджеров, агентские издержки и структура собственности. Вестник С.-Петербургского ун-та. Сер. Менеджмент (4): 118–191.)

Kay N. M. 1984. The Emergent Firm: Knowledge, Ignorance and Surprise in Economic Organization. Macmillan: London.

Kay N. M. 1991. Multinational enterprise as strategic choice: Some transaction cost perspectives. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London.

Kay N. M. 2000. The Resource-based approach to multinational enterprise. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Kindleberger C. P. 1969. International Business Abroad. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.

Kogut B., Zander U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4): 625–645.

Kor Y. Y., Mahoney J. T. 2000. Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. Journal of Management Studies 37 (1): 99–139.

Krugman P. R. 1991. Geography and Trade. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Marglin S. 1974. What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics 6 (2): 60–112.

Markusen J. R. 1995. The boundaries of multinational enterprise and the theory of international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–189.

Martin R., Sunley P. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 13 (1): 5–25.

Marx K. 1959. Capital. Vol. I. Lawrence and Wishart: London. (Русск. пер.: Маркс К. 1988. Капитал. Т. 1. М.: Политиздат.)

Newfarmer R. 1985. (ed.). Profits, Progress and Poverty: Case Studies of International Industries in Latin America. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, Ind.

Ostry S. 1998. Technology, productivity and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 85–99.

Penrose E. T. 1955. Research on the business firms: Limits to growth and size of firms. American Economic Review 45 (2): 531–543.

Penrose E. T. 1956. Foreign investment and the growth of the firm. Economic Journal 66 (262): 220–235.

Penrose E. T. 1959/1995. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Penrose E. T. 1960. The growth of the firm — A case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Business History Review XXXIV (1): 1–23.

Penrose E. T. 1962. Some problems of policy towards direct private foreign investment in developing countries. Middle East Economic Papers. American Research Bureau, American University of Beirut: Lebanon; 121–139.

Penrose E. T. 1964. Monopoly and competition in the international petroleum industry. The Yearbook of World Affairs. Vol. 18. Stevens: London.

Penrose E. T. 1968. Problems associated with the growth of international firms. Tijdschrift voor Vennootschappen, Vereiningingen en Stichtingen 9.

Penrose E. T. 1973. The Changing Role of Multinational Corporations in Developing Countries. Paper submitted to the United Nations Group of Eminent Persons to Study the Impact of Multinational Corporations on Development and on International Relations: Geneva.

Penrose E. T. 1985. The theory of the growth of the firm twenty five years after. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Oeconomicae Negotiorum (Upsala Lectures in Business). Vol. 20.

Penrose E. T. 1987. Multinational corporations. In: The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics; 562–564.

Penrose E. T. 1990. ‘Dumping’, ‘unfair’ competition and multinational corporations. Japan and the World Economy 2 (2): 180–187.

Penrose E. T. 1995. Foreword to the Third Edition of ‘The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press: Oxford; i–xxi.

Penrose E. T. 1996. Growth of the firm and networking. International Encyclopaedia of Business and Management. Routledge: London; 1716–1724.

Penrose P., Pitelis C. 1999. Edith Penrose: Life, contribution and influence. Contributions to Political Economy 18 (1): 3–22.

Peoples J., Sugden R. 2000. Divide and rule by transnational corporations. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Pitelis C. N. 1991. Market and Non-Market Hierarchies: Theories of Insitutional Failure. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.

Pitelis C. N. 1996. Effective demand, outward investment and in the (theory of the) transnational corporation: An empirical investigation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 43 (2): 192–206.

Pitelis C. N. (ed.). 2002. The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford University Press.

Pitelis C. N. 2004. Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy. International Business Review 13 (4): 523–532.

Pitelis C. N. 2007. A behavioral resource-based view of the firm — The synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959). Organization Science 18 (3): 478–490.

Pitelis C. N., Wahl M. 1998. Edith Penrose: A pioneer of stakeholder theory. Long Range Planning 31 (2): 252–261.

Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. 1991. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London.

Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. 2000. The (theory of the) transnational firm: The 1990s and beyond. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

Pitelis C. N., Verbeke A. 2007. Edith Penrose and the future of the multinational enterprise. Management International Review 47 (2): 139–150.

Porter M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: N. Y. (Русск. пер.: Портер М. 2007. Конкурентная стратегия. М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс.)

Porter M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan. (Русск. пер.: Портер М. 1993. Международная конкуренция. Конкурентные преимущества стран. М.: Международные отношения.)

Porter M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76 (6): 77–90.

Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3): 79–91. (Русск. пер.: Прахалад К. К., Хамел Г. 2003. Ключевая компетенция корпорации. Вестник С.-Петербургского ун-та. Сер. Менеджмент (3): 18–46.)

Richardson G. 1960. Information and Investment: A Study in the Working of the Competitive Economy. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

Richardson G. 1972. The organisation of industry. Economic Journal 82 (327): 883–896.

Richardson G. 1999. Mrs Penrose and neoclassical theory. Contributions to Political Economy 18 (1): 23–30.

Rugman A. M. 1986. New theories of the multinational enterprise: An assessment of internalization theory. Bulletin of Economic Research 38 (2): 101–118.

Sugden R. 1991. The importance of distributional considerations. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London; 168–193.

Teece D. J. 1977. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource costs of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal 87 (346): 242–261.

Teece D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.

Vernon R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (2): 90–207.

Williamson O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. Free Press: N. Y.

Williamson O. E. 1981. The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature 19 (4): 1537–1568.

Yamin M. 1991. A reassessment of Hymer’s contribution to the theory of the transnational corporation. In: Pitelis C. N., Sugden R. (eds.). The Nature of the Transnational Firm. Routledge: London.

You J.-I. 1995. Small firms in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (3): 441–462.

Загрузки

Опубликован

10.12.2007

Как цитировать

Пителис, Х. Н. (2007). Транснациональная компания: трактовка с позиций ресурсной концепции. Российский журнал менеджмента, 5(4), 21–40. извлечено от https://rjm.spbu.ru/article/view/568

Выпуск

Раздел

Новые исследования